top of page
gold14.png

Discover Placer Gold and Diamonds in Ontario


Unlock the thrill of treasure hunting in Ontario’s rugged landscapes! From ancient glacial deposits to hidden riverbeds, hobby prospectors can explore sites rich in placer gold and diamonds. Learn how to read glacial features, follow the trails of transported minerals, and uncover the stories each stone tells. Whether you’re panning a river or studying esker deposits, Ontario offers endless opportunities for discovery and adventure.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Finding Placer Gold and Diamonds in Ontario

A Field Guide on Placer Gold and Diamonds for Hobby Prospectors

 

Ontario has long attracted prospectors searching for mineral wealth. The province is internationally known for its hard-rock mining in the Canadian Shield, where major deposits of gold, silver, nickel, and copper have been mined for more than a century. Yet beyond the underground mines and rusty gossans that mark mineralized bedrock lies another fascinating and often overlooked part of Ontario’s geology—placer deposits. These natural concentrations of heavy minerals form when water or glacial activity erodes gold and other durable minerals from their original bedrock sources. The debris is later deposited in sands and gravels of fossil glacial features. For modern rockhounds, gold panners, and hobby prospectors, Ontario’s placer deposits offer a chance to search for gold, diamonds, and indicator minerals in the province’s rivers and glacial sediments. If finding placer gold and diamonds in Ontario intrigues you, learn how past glaciers can bring you success.

 

 

 

 

The largest placer-style gold recoveries in Ontario occurred in the Abitibi region, particularly around Lake Abitibi and the lowlands near the Ontario–Quebec border. During the early 1900s, prospectors working this area recovered fine placer gold from glacial out-wash gravels, eskers, and river sediments draining the Abitibi greenstone belt, one of Canada’s richest gold-producing geological regions. Although these placer deposits were never large by global standards, several small operations reportedly recovered hundreds of ounces of fine gold, mostly in the form of flakes rather than nuggets. And then there was the Eldorado discovery where thousands of ounces were found in a cavity with one nugget as big as a butternut.

 

While Ontario seems not to contain the large commercial placer fields found in places like the Yukon or California, placer gold and diamond indicator minerals can still be found in Ontario. During the last Ice Age, glaciers eroded gold from its original hard-rock sources and spread it across the landscape within tills, eskers, and ancient melt water channels. As a result, understanding Ontario’s glacial geology, ice-flow directions, and former melt water systems are one of the most important skills for anyone interested in finding placer gold or diamonds in Ontario. By learning how glaciers shaped the province’s terrain and where sediments were naturally sorted and concentrated, prospectors can greatly improve their chances of discovering these deposits.

Table of Contents

  • A Field Guide on Placer Gold and Diamonds for Hobby Prospectors

  • Gold Sources in Ontario

  • How Glaciers Shaped Placer Gold Distribution in Ontario

  • Understanding Eskers: Ancient Rivers Beneath the Ice

  • How Placer Deposits Form

  • Buried Pre-glacial River

  • How Far Do Glaciers Transport Minerals?

  • Float is key to finding Placer Gold and diamonds in Ontario

  • Float Tracing Techniques for Prospectors

  • Ice Flow Direction in Ontario

  • What Happened When the Glacier Melted

  • How do Eskers Form at the Front of Ice Flows?

  • Why Glacial Geology is key to finding Placer gold

  • How to Determine the Direction of Ice Flow When Prospecting in Ontario

  • Step-by-Step Method for Tracing Mineralized Float in Ontario

  • Why Float Tracing Works for Finding Placer Gold in Ontario

  • How Placer Gold Forms in Ontario

  • Heavy Minerals Associated with Placer Gold in Ontario

  • Heavy Minerals Associated with Placer Gold: Regional Comparison

  • Why Quartz Is Often Absent from Placer Gold Deposits

  • Eskers: Natural Concentrators of Gold and Heavy Minerals

  • What are some Gold Bearing Eskers in Ontario?

  • Example of Esker Sedimentation: The Frankford–Marlbank Esker

  • How to Prospect an Esker for Gold and Heavy Minerals

  • Why Is It So Hard to Find Kimberlite Pipes?

  • How does Kimberlite Weather?

  • Kimberlite Indicator Minerals

  • Indicator Mineral Transport

  • Diamonds Found in Glacial Drift Around the Great Lakes

  • Canadian Diamonds Found in U.S. States

  • Diamond Discoveries in Ontario

  • Diamonds and Indicator Minerals in the Wawa Region

  • FAQ: Ontario Placer Gold and Diamond Prospecting

Gold Sources in Ontario

The Canadian Shield and Bancroft Region

The Bancroft area contains known occurrences of placer gold, although they are generally small and not mined commercially. Bancroft lies within the Canadian Shield and sits atop very ancient Precambrian rocks including granites, metavolcanic rocks, and greenstone formations.

These rocks can contain gold-bearing quartz veins that act as the original source of placer gold found in nearby streams and glacial sediments.

Small quantities of gold have been reported from areas around Spruce Lake and along the York River near Bancroft. The gold is typically extremely fine, often appearing as flour gold. Streams that cut through eskers or glacial gravel deposits in the region can occasionally concentrate these tiny flakes.

 

​In the Canadian Shield, gold is most commonly found in certain rock types, particularly within greenstone belts, which are metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary sequences including basalts, andesites, rhyolites, tuffs, and interlayered sedimentary rocks such as banded iron formations (BIFs). These rocks often host gold in quartz veins, sulfide-rich zones, and shear zones, making belts like the Abitibi, Wawa–Michipicoten, and Timmins areas some of the richest gold-bearing regions in Ontario.

Gold is also found in metasedimentary rocks such as greywacke, schist, and iron formations, where hydrothermal fluids deposited gold along faults and fractures. Less commonly, granitoid intrusions like granite, granodiorite, and tonalite can host gold, usually along shear zones or late-stage hydrothermal veins, often near greenstone belts. Across these rock types, gold is typically associated with sulfide minerals such as pyrite, pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite, and chalcopyrite, which form lodes and veins that may later contribute to placer deposits. Overall, mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks within greenstone belts are the most consistently gold-rich in the Canadian Shield.

Where did all the gold go?

Ontario and California both had enormous gold endowments in the late 1800s. California was estimated to hold roughly 118 million ounces of gold, while Ontario's rock was believed to contain around 200 million ounces. Over the following century and a half, California yielded an extraordinary amount of placer gold—about 68 million ounces recovered from rivers and ancient buried channels. In contrast, Ontario has produced only a few thousand ounces of placer gold, despite its larger overall gold endowment.

Both regions have experienced long periods of erosion capable of releasing gold from bedrock deposits. Under normal conditions, erosion of gold-bearing rocks should gradually liberate gold into streams where it accumulates in placer deposits. California clearly followed this pattern: erosion of the gold-bearing veins of the Sierra Nevada supplied large quantities of gold to rivers, which then concentrated it in stream gravels and ancient paleo-channels that were later mined.

Ontario, however, followed a very different geological path. Much of the province was repeatedly covered by continental ice sheets during the Ice Ages. These glaciers did not simply erode bedrock; they scraped, transported, and redistributed sediments across vast distances, mixing gold into glacial till and burying former landscapes beneath thick layers of drift. Ancient river systems were often filled or sealed beneath these deposits, creating fossil valleys and buried channels that are difficult to detect from the surface.

Because of this glacial reworking, much of the gold released by erosion in Ontario may not have formed obvious modern placer deposits. Instead, it may be dispersed through glacial sediments or concentrated within buried paleo-channels beneath the drift cover. The fact that California has produced roughly 6,800 times more placer gold than Ontario, despite Ontario’s larger gold endowment, suggests that significant quantities of placer gold in Ontario may remain undiscovered. Rather than being absent, the gold may simply be hidden—trapped within glacial deposits or buried ancient drainage systems that have yet to be properly explored.

 

In this sense, Ontario may represent a geological puzzle: a gold-rich province where the processes of glaciation have obscured the natural pathways by which placer deposits normally become visible. Discovering where that redistributed gold ultimately accumulated—whether in buried channels, glacial concentrations, or reworked post-glacial streams—remains one of the more intriguing unanswered questions for prospectors and geologists.

 

Ontario’s Richest Gold Province: The Abitibi Greenstone Belt

The most gold-rich geological province in Ontario is the Abitibi Greenstone Belt, stretching across northeastern Ontario and into western Quebec.

Major Gold Districts

The belt hosts several world-class gold districts including:

The Red Lake district is especially famous. Two mines—the Campbell Mine and Red Lake Mine—exploited the Campbell–Red Lake ore body, one of the richest gold deposits ever discovered.

High-Grade Lode Gold Deposits (Campbell–Red Lake ore body)

The ore from this system averaged roughly 22 grams of gold per tonne, far richer than most gold deposits worldwide. Gold found in this type of bedrock vein system is known as lode gold.

Many of these deposits occur along faults and shear zones, often marked by rust-colored weathered rock called gossan, which can signal mineralization below.

How Glaciers Shaped Placer Gold Distribution in Ontario

The Influence of the Ice Age

During the last Ice Age, massive glaciers covered most of Ontario. As these ice sheets advanced, they scraped the landscape and eroded exposed bedrock deposits.

 

Gold and other minerals were incorporated into the ice and carried southward. When the glaciers melted about 14,000 years ago, they deposited this material across the province.

 

As a result, gold can now occur in:

  • Eskers

  • Moraines and drumlins

  • Outwash plains

  • Stream gravels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Modern waterways draining ancient greenstone belts may also re-concentrate this material. Fine flakes of gold—often called “colours”—can accumulate in gravel bars, bends in streams, and natural riffles where heavy minerals settle.

Why Ontario Has Few Large Placer Deposits

Despite Ontario’s rich bedrock gold sources, large placer deposits are rare. This is largely due to glaciation.

Ice sheets scoured the landscape, sometimes removing tens to hundreds of metres of rock, destroying older placer deposits and mixing them into unsorted glacial sediments such as moraines.

For this reason, better placer concentrations tend to form where water has reworked glacial sediments, separating heavy minerals from lighter material.

​​

 

 

 

 

The key is finding areas where gold has been naturally concentrated rather than widely dispersed.

 

Understanding Eskers: Ancient Rivers Beneath the Ice

What Are Eskers?

Eskers are long winding ridges of sand and gravel formed by rivers flowing beneath or within glaciers.

During periods of heavy melting near the end of the Ice Age, large meltwater rivers flowed through tunnels inside the ice sheet. These rivers deposited gravel and sand along their channels.

When the ice melted away, the river beds remained as raised ridges across the landscape.

 

 

Why Eskers Matter for Prospectors

Eskers are important because flowing water sorted the sediments, separating heavy minerals from lighter material.

 

This means eskers may contain:

  • Gold particles

  • Heavy mineral concentrates

  • Diamond indicator minerals

 

Unlike moraines, which consist of unsorted glacial debris, eskers contain cleaner gravel deposits, making them attractive targets for small-scale prospecting.

Major Esker Systems in Ontario

Some eskers in Ontario extend remarkable distances. In northern Ontario, individual eskers may run 50 to 150 kilometers, and some connected systems extend even farther. One notable example is the Munro Esker near Timmins, which stretches for more than 200 kilometres across northeastern Ontario.

How Placer Deposits Form

 

Natural Concentration of Heavy Minerals

 

Placer deposits form when heavy minerals become concentrated in sand and gravel through natural processes such as flowing water or glacial movement.

Gold is especially prone to concentration because of its high density. Diamonds themselves are not particularly heavy, but the minerals associated with them often are.

 

Important diamond indicator minerals include:

  • Garnet

  • Chromite

  • Ilmenite

  • Chrome diopside

 

Because these minerals are heavy, they may concentrate in stream gravels and glacial deposits, providing clues that diamond-bearing rocks may exist nearby.

Why are Indicator Minerals Important?

 

Indicator minerals help prospectors determine whether valuable deposits may exist upstream or up-ice from where the minerals are found.

Finding such minerals does not guarantee diamonds or gold, but it suggests the geological conditions are favorable.

 

Buried Pre-glacial Rivers

Ancient Rivers Hidden Beneath Glacial Sediments

Some of the most intriguing exploration targets in Ontario are buried pre-glacial river channels.

Before the Ice Age, rivers flowed across landscapes that were very different from today. When glaciers advanced, many valleys were filled with sand, gravel, and glacial sediments.

These buried channels are invisible at the surface but can be detected using:

  • Drilling

  • Geophysical surveys

  • Geological mapping

 

In some areas, these channels may be more than 100 feet deep.

Examples of Buried Channels in Ontario

 

Several well-known buried river systems exist in Ontario.

St. David’s Gorge (Niagara Region)

 

Before glaciation, a deep river valley existed near Niagara Falls. During the Ice Age this valley was filled with hundreds of feet of sediment. Engineers encountered the buried gorge while constructing early hydroelectric tunnels. Having been buried by the glaciers this canyon might harbor huge placer deposits built up during the province's pre-history. Much as they are deeply buried, these pre-glacial canyonds might be the key to finding placer gold and diamonds in Ontario.

 

 

 

The Laurentian and Erigan Rivers

Before the Great Lakes formed:

  • The Laurentian River drained eastward through what is now the Lake Ontario basin.

  • The Erigan River flowed through the region now occupied by Lake Erie.

Glaciation later reshaped these landscapes and buried much of the ancient drainage.

The Newmarket Buried Channel

One of the largest buried channels lies beneath the Oak Ridges Moraine north of Toronto.

The Newmarket Buried Channel extends for over 100 kilometers and reaches depths exceeding 200 meters in places. Today it contains important groundwater aquifers formed by melt water deposits.​

The buried paleochannels of the Abitibi–Timmins area 

 

The area around Timmins within the Abitibi Greenstone Belt is widely regarded by geologists as the best place in Ontario for buried placer channels.

Why this area is favorable:

  • One of the richest gold regions in the world

  • Numerous large lode deposits (e.g., Porcupine Gold Camp)

  • Ancient river systems existed before Pleistocene glaciation

  • Glaciers later buried valleys under till and glaciolacustrine clay

 

Why Buried Channels Interest Prospectors

Because these ancient rivers existed before glaciation, they may have had more time to concentrate placer minerals such as gold. Although little exploration has occurred so far, buried channels remain intriguing targets for geological research. 

 

Buried river channels in Ontario are often compared to those in Sri Lanka because both regions contain ancient river systems that were later buried and preserved beneath younger sediments, creating environments that can trap heavy minerals such as gold and gemstones. Despite being on different continents, several geological processes make these buried channels surprisingly similar.

In both Ontario and Sri Lanka, older river systems formed when landscapes and climates were different from today. Over time these rivers either changed course, were filled with sediment, or were buried by other geological processes.

  • In Ontario, many channels were buried by glacial deposits during the last Ice Ages. Thick layers of till, sand, and gravel left by continental glaciers can hide older river valleys beneath the surface.

  • In Sri Lanka, the channels were commonly buried by tropical weathering products and younger alluvial sediments as rivers migrated across the landscape.

In both places, the result is an ancient river valley sealed beneath younger materials, preserving the original gravel bed where heavy minerals settled.

​​

 

​​

​​

 

 

 

 

How Far Do Glaciers Transport Minerals?

 

Long-Distance Transport

Large continental ice sheets can transport rock fragments hundreds of kilometres. It is usually the larger erratic that people see and marvel as to their far-away origins. Numerous erratics along the Niagara Escarpment are composed of  granite from Northern Ontario, marking the path of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and often standing out on flat agricultural land as natural landmarks. Within the vein dykes of the Dark Star claim rockhounds are forever lifting large rounded cobbles from the trenches. Clearly they were moved and dumped there during the last ice age.

Fast-moving ice streams within the glacier acted like conveyor belts, transporting sediment long distances. The ice itself was not so quick to move boulders as were the rivers entrained and beneath the ice flow. Prospecting these sub glacial streams is key to finding placer gold in Ontario.

Local Transport Is More Common

Despite some spectacular long-distance transport, studies show that most glacial sediments are local in origin.

Research in southern Ontario found that most pebbles in glacial gravels came from nearby bedrock sources. Similar results were found in sampling around the Kirkland Lake gold district.

Gold particles were commonly detected within 2,000 feet of their source, but were usually absent beyond 10,000 feet.

For hobby prospectors, this is encouraging. Finding gold flakes in a stream may mean the bedrock source is relatively close.

Eskers typically formed in segments, each fed by meltwater draining from only a short distance behind the ice margin. As the glacier retreated, new segments formed farther back.

This means sediments in a given section of an esker were usually derived from a relatively small drainage area, often within about five miles.

 

 

Float is key to Finding Placer Gold and Diamonds in Ontario

What Is Float?

Float refers to pieces of mineralized rock that have been separated from bedrock and transported by weathering, erosion, or glaciers.

Float may appear as:

  • Loose boulders in forests or fields

  • Rocks exposed in road cuts (e.g Just north of Peterborough where Highway 28 cuts through the drumlin field)

  • Pieces found in gravel pits

  • Stones lying on eskers or outwash plains

  • Cobbles trapped within crevices or fissures

 

These fragments can provide valuable clues about nearby mineral deposits. Boulders that landed on gravel ridges or eskers may remain exposed today, while those that fell into low areas may be buried beneath sediments or muskeg.

Float Tracing Techniques for Prospectors

Following Boulder Trains

One of the oldest prospecting methods is float tracing—following fragments of mineralized rock back to their bedrock source.

Clusters of similar rocks may form a boulder train, a trail of glacially transported material. Think Hansel and Grettle leaving a trail of breadcrumbs from whence they came.

By studying these trains, prospectors can estimate:

  • The width of the mineralized zone

  • The direction of glacial transport

  • The approximate location of the original source

 

Why are these small Fragments important?

When mineralized rock occurs not only as large boulders but also as small pebbles and sediment, it suggests the source is somewhere up-ice and if you are fortunate, somewhere nearby. Careful mapping and systematic sampling can help trace the material back toward the source.

Ice Flow Direction in Ontario

Did All the Ice Move the Same Way?

The glacier covering Ontario—the Laurentide Ice Sheet—did not move in a single direction. Instead, it behaved like a dome with several flow lobes. At its maximum extent about 20,000 years ago, the ice sheet was several kilometers thick in places and covered nearly all of Ontario. The main center of this ice mass was located around Hudson Bay, where snow accumulation and cold conditions allowed the ice to grow thickest. From this central dome, the ice flowed outward in all directions across the Canadian Shield and into the Great Lakes region.

Geologists believe the Laurentide Ice Sheet actually had several major ice domes, rather than a single center. Two of the most important domes influencing Ontario were the Keewatin Dome to the northwest of Hudson Bay and the Labrador Dome to the northeast. Ice flowing from these centers spread southward across Ontario toward the Great Lakes and the northern United States.

Typical ice flow patterns included:

  • Northern Ontario: southwest or south

  • Eastern Ontario: south or southeast

  • Southern Ontario: flow influenced by Great Lakes basins

 

As glaciers thickened and advanced, the great Lakes basins funneled ice into distinct glacial lobes. Large tongues of ice flowed southward through the lake depressions. Because the basins were lower than the surrounding terrain, ice moved faster and became thicker within them. This focused flow and increased the glacier’s ability to erode the bedrock, which helped deepen and widen the basins even further. 

Some interesting glacial depositions along the shore of Lake Ontario are the Scarborough bluffs, The Ganaraska Escarpment and the Toronto Islands, which are part of a glacially influenced formation known as a post-glacial sand spit. They were created from sediments deposited by melt water streams flowing from the retreating Laurentide Ice Sheet into what was once Glacial Lake Iroquois, a precursor to modern Lake Ontario.

The Great Lake basins also influenced the direction of sediment transport across Ontario. As ice moved through the Great Lakes troughs, it carried rocks, minerals, and glacial debris from the Canadian Shield southward into southern Ontario and the northern United States. When the ice began to retreat, melt water flowing along the edges of these lobes deposited large glacial landforms such as moraines, out-wash plains, and eskers around the margins of the lake basins. These deposits still mark the former positions of glacial lobes today.

Geologists identify these directions from features such as:

  • Striations on bedrock (lots to see at the base of the Bruce Peninsula)

  • Drumlins (e.g. just north of Peterborough on highway 28)

  • Glacial lineations

 

Many regions show multiple ice-flow directions as the glacier expanded and later retreated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What Happened When the Glacier Melted

Retreat of the Ice Sheet

The glacier did not simply slide backward as it melted. Instead:

  • Ice continued to flow forward.

  • The front melted faster than new ice arrived.

 

Because of this imbalance, the glacier appeared to retreat northward. The ice retreat was not uniform: different lobes and sectors of the ice sheet melted at different rates, influenced by topography, climate, and the presence of pro-glacial lakes such as Glacial Lake Iroquois and Glacial Lake Agassiz. In southern Ontario, de-glaciation was largely complete by about 12,000 years ago, about 10,000 years from when the ice sheet was at its largest.

Formation of Glacial Landscapes

As the ice melted, it created many important geological features for finding placer gold and finding placer diamonds including:

  • Moraines

  • Eskers

  • Out-wash plains

  • Large glacial lakes such as Lake Iroquois, the ancestor of modern Lake Ontario.

 

These melt water systems redistributed sediments and helped form the landscapes that prospectors explore today.

 

How do Eskers Form at the Front of Ice Flows?

 

Eskers that form at the front (terminus) of ice sheets develop when melt water rivers flowing inside or beneath a glacier emerge at the glacier’s edge and rapidly deposit the sediment they were carrying. During the final stages of glaciation, large volumes of melt water travel through tunnels within the ice. These sub-glacial rivers carry enormous loads of sand, gravel, and stones that have been eroded from the bedrock beneath the glacier. As long as the water is confined within the ice tunnel, it behaves like a normal river and continues transporting sediment downstream.

When this sediment-laden water reaches the margin of the glacier, conditions change quickly. The confining ice walls disappear, the slope of the channel decreases, and the flow velocity drops. Because the water suddenly loses energy, it can no longer carry its full load of sediment. Gravel and sand begin to accumulate at the glacier’s edge, forming a ridge that marks the former position of the melt water tunnel. As the glacier retreats backward, the tunnel continues to release sediment along the ice margin, gradually building a long, sinuous ridge.

 

 

 

 

 

These ridges remain on the landscape after the glacier melts away completely. The sediment originally deposited inside the ice tunnel collapses slightly as the supporting ice disappears, leaving behind the characteristic narrow, winding ridge of sand and gravel known as an esker. Because the melt water streams were strong and well confined, the sediments are usually well sorted and layered, with coarse gravels near the center and finer materials toward the edges. When finding placer gold in an esker you will usually find it lower down at the bottom of the gravel layer.

Eskers formed at the front of ice sheets often connect to other glacial landforms such as out-wash plains or deltas. At the point where the melt water exits the glacier, the sediment may spread outward into a fan-shaped deposit before continuing downstream. These terminal eskers are important to geologists because they mark former ice margins and reveal the direction of melt water drainage during the retreat of the ice sheet at the end of the last Ice Age.

Why Glacial Geology is Key to finding Placer Gold in Ontario

Understanding glacial geology is key to finding placer gold in Ontario because glaciers transported minerals in different directions at different times, prospectors must study glacial flow patterns carefully when looking for placer gold and diamonds in Ontario.

Gold flakes or indicator minerals for gold and diamonds are found in streams, eskers, or gravel deposits; they may point toward hidden mineral sources located up-ice from the discovery site.

For hobby prospectors exploring Ontario, success often depends less on luck and more on understanding the glacial story that has been written on the land.

How to Determine the Direction of Ice Flow When Prospecting in Ontario

Using Float Orientation to Identify Glacial Movement

Measure the diameter of each float fragment and note whether it has a long axis. If present, record the direction in which this axis points. Plotting these orientations on a map may reveal patterns caused by glacial movement.

 

Glacial ice tends to push, rotate, and transport large rocks as it moves. Because boulders are irregular in shape, the ice exerts the most force along their longest dimension, aligning them parallel to the direction of ice flow. By mapping the orientation of multiple boulders over an area, geologists can determine the dominant flow direction of the glacier, as most boulders will show a consistent alignment – long dimension pointing in the direction of ice movement.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition, pebble trains and elongated glacial erratics can reinforce this information. When combined with other indicators, such as striations (scratches) on bedrock, drumlins, and eskers, the orientation of boulders provides a reliable record of ice movement patterns during the last glaciation. Drumlins tend to be steepest on the side from which the ice was pushing and then they taper down to nothing in the direction the ice was going.

This technique of studying float markers is especially useful for prospectors tracing gold-bearing float or indicator minerals, because it helps identify the up-ice source of the boulders and associated mineralized material.

Further evidence of ice movement may include:

• Glacial striations scratched into bedrock
• Fluted ridges of debris
• Drumlins or streamlined hills

 

Topographical maps can also help identify ridges and depressions shaped by glacial flow.

 

Once the direction of ice movement is known, the prospector can search up-ice toward the possible source.

 

Step-by-Step Method for Tracing Mineralized Float in Ontario

Systematic Float Tracing for Gold and Indicator Minerals

  1. Map the Location
    Plot the float fragments on a detailed map to reveal distribution patterns and the likely transport direction.

  2. Study the Shape and Roundness
    Examine how rounded or angular each piece is to estimate how far it has traveled from its source.

  3. Determine the Direction of Ice Flow
    Use glacial indicators to establish the ice movement that transported the float.

  4. Record Associated Minerals and Rocks
    Note the minerals and rock types in the float to identify potential sources and valuable indicators.

  5. Establish Sampling Lines
    Set up stations perpendicular to ice flow to systematically track changes in float abundance.

  6. Dig Test Holes
    Excavate small pits at each station to access subsurface sediments for examination.

  7. Screen the Material
    Pass excavated material through a half-inch mesh to separate gravel from finer sediment.

  8. Sort the Pebbles
    Group fragments by rock type and weigh them to estimate the composition of the deposit.

  9. Count and Classify the Fragments
    Record the number and roundness of fragments to help trace the source direction.

  10. Test for Magnetic and Conductive Minerals
    Use a magnet or conductivity detector to identify metallic or magnetic minerals in the sample.

  11. Process the Finer Material
    Sieve material through a 35-mesh screen and quarter the sample for representative testing.

  12. Pan for Heavy Minerals
    Pan each fraction to examine and record visible heavy minerals such as gold, magnetite, or garnet.

  13. Save Samples for Further Testing
    Package remaining material for laboratory analysis to detect trace metals not visible in the field.

  14. Record Pebble Orientations
    Note the alignment of elongated pebbles to confirm ice movement directions.

  15. Move Up-Ice
    If results are promising, continue sampling progressively up-ice to locate the source deposit.

 

By repeating the process, the prospector may gradually trace the float back toward its bedrock source. Remember that despite a few rare exceptions, glacially derived sediment is usually not transported significant distances by the ice sheet, but in an esker the distance can be considerable.

Why Float Tracing Works for Finding Placer Gold in Ontario

Glacial deposits in Ontario are often surprisingly local in origin. Many rock fragments traveled only a short distance from their bedrock source before being deposited.

Because of this, careful float tracing can lead prospectors closer and closer to the original deposit.

Although this method requires patience and systematic work, it has been responsible for the discovery of numerous mineral deposits throughout Canada.

For hobby prospectors, float tracing offers something equally valuable—the chance to follow geological clues across the landscape and perhaps uncover a hidden mineral source beneath the forests and glacial sediments of Ontario.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are Diamonds Transported Further Than Gold in Glacial Ice?

Diamonds are generally transported farther than gold in glacial systems due to differences in density, durability, and how they interact with ice. Gold is extremely dense (~19.3 g/cm³) and tends to settle quickly in streams, rivers, or glacial melt water, whereas diamonds are lighter (~3.5 g/cm³) and can be more easily carried within ice over long distances. Diamonds are also extremely hard and chemically stable, allowing them to survive long transport without breaking down, while gold, being softer and malleable, may abrade or stick in sediments, limiting its dispersal.

Glacial ice can carry diamonds embedded in lighter host rocks, such as kimberlite or lamprophyre, much farther before depositing them, which is why diamonds are often found hundreds of kilometers from their source. Gold, on the other hand, is usually concentrated closer to its lode source, although it can still be redistributed locally by glaciers. As a result, placer diamonds in glaciated regions often provide the first clues to kimberlite sources, while gold placers typically indicate nearby bedrock mineralization.

How Placer Gold Forms in Ontario

Gold is typically found in quartz veins within bedrock, often accompanied by small amounts of other minerals such as pyrite, pyrrhotite, arsenopyrite, galena, sphalerite, and scheelite. Over long periods, weathering breaks down the surrounding rock, releasing gold particles into the environment.

Because gold is extremely dense, it behaves differently from most other minerals during erosion. When transported by water or glaciers, gold tends to settle in low-lying areas where it can accumulate, such as stream beds, gravel bars, bedrock cracks, and ancient river channels. Over time, these natural traps concentrate gold particles and form placer deposits.

In Ontario, placer gold is usually found as fine dust, small flakes, or thin scales, with larger nuggets appearing only occasionally. Most nuggets are worn and pitted due to long periods of transport and erosion, reflecting the extensive geological history of the province’s gold-bearing regions.

Heavy Minerals Associated with Placer Gold in Ontario

Ontario’s placer gold deposits have some characteristics that make their associated heavy minerals slightly distinctive compared with other regions, largely due to the province’s glacial history and Precambrian geology.

Common Heavy Minerals Found with Ontario Placer Gold

Predominance of magnetite, ilmenite, and garnet: While these heavy minerals are common in many placer districts worldwide, in Ontario they are often found in association with finely disseminated sulfide-bearing quartz veins, which were eroded by glaciers and rivers. Garnets in Ontario are often small, rounded, and worn, reflecting long glacial transport. Pyrope garnets, for example, are a notable indicator mineral in parts of northern Ontario.

Key heavy minerals associated with placer gold include:

  1. Magnetite – An iron oxide mineral that is strongly magnetic. It often forms black sand layers along with gold in stream beds and gravel bars.

  2. Ilmenite – An iron-titanium oxide that is slightly less dense than magnetite but still concentrates with gold in sediments.

  3. Garnet – Specifically pyrope or almandine garnet, which are reddish to violet-red minerals that are dense and resistant to weathering. Their presence can help trace mineralized zones.

  4. Chromite – A dense black metallic mineral, often found in glacial gravels with gold.

  5. Sphalerite and Galena – Sulfide minerals sometimes found in older placer systems derived from sulfide-rich quartz veins.

  6. Other Resistant Heavy Minerals – Such as zircon, cassiterite, and monazite, which are chemically stable and tend to accumulate alongside gold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Ontario, many placer gold deposits have been reworked and dispersed by glaciers rather than solely by rivers. In areas further to the south this is less likely. As a result, Ontario’s gravels often contain a mixture of local and up-ice material, producing an unusual combination of heavy minerals in a single sample—magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, and occasionally chromite or zircon.

This contrasts with typical river-dominated placer systems, such as those in the Yukon or California, where heavy minerals are more directly derived from nearby bedrock and less blended by ice transport.

In some northern Ontario locations, placer gravels also contain kimberlite indicator minerals, including pyrope garnet, magnesian ilmenite, olivine, and chrome diopside. These minerals can signal the presence of potential diamond-bearing kimberlite sources, which is relatively uncommon in most other placer gold districts.

Ontario’s placer gold is generally very fine, appearing as “flour gold” or small flakes, and the associated heavy minerals are typically small and worn. This reflects extensive glacial transport and mechanical sorting over thousands of years, in contrast to coarser gold and minerals found in river-dominated placers elsewhere.

Overall, the Ontario heavy mineral signature—a glacially mixed suite of magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, and sometimes kimberlite indicators with fine particle sizes—provides a subtle but valuable guide for hobby prospectors.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Heavy Minerals Associated with Placer Gold: Regional Comparison

Heavy minerals associated with placer gold vary by region, reflecting the local geology and transport processes. In Ontario, glaciers have mixed materials from multiple sources, producing a fine-grained assemblage of magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, and occasionally kimberlite indicator minerals such as pyrope garnet, olivine, and chrome diopside.

In contrast, California’s Sierra Nevada placers are dominated by magnetite, chromite, garnet, zircon, ilmenite, and tourmaline, with coarser gold reflecting shorter fluvial transport from nearby quartz veins.

The Yukon’s placer deposits, including the Klondike region, contain magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, cassiterite, and occasional zircon or sapphire fragments, also featuring coarse gold and nuggets derived directly from local metamorphic and igneous rocks.

These differences highlight how glacial mixing in Ontario produces a uniquely blended heavy mineral suite, while California and Yukon placers reflect more localized sources and coarser material.

These minerals are concentrated in natural “traps” such as riffles, gravel bars, and ancient river channels, just like gold. Prospectors often focus on layers rich in heavy minerals because they indicate areas where gold may also be present.

Most commonly it is a sand that accumulateds in your pan, a heavy sand thats composed of finely ground indicator minerals. by its color you can surmise as to what you are seeing. Among the most common sands are those comprised of magnetite and ilmenite—often referred to as “black sand”—garnet, known as “ruby sand,” zircon or “white sand,” and monazite, the so-called “yellow sand.” Tinstone, or cassiterite, is frequently encountered in gold placers and can represent a valuable by-product in its own right. Prospectors should also pay close attention to platinum, which appears gray, and osmiridium, a silvery alloy; both are often more valuable than gold itself. Recognizing and following these heavy mineral sands can greatly enhance the efficiency of placer gold exploration, providing visual clues to the presence of not only gold but other economically significant metals. As you follow up ice (or stream) your indicator minerals should increase in size and end up being something you can identify by its crystal.

 

Why Quartz Is Often Absent from Placer Gold Deposits

Quartz is often absent from placer gold deposits because of the way placer deposits form and the physical properties of quartz compared with gold and other heavy minerals.

1. Density and Settling

Gold is extremely dense (about 19.3 g/cm³), whereas quartz is much lighter (around 2.65 g/cm³). During erosion and transport by water or glacial action, the heavy gold particles settle quickly in low spots like stream beds, gravel bars, or cracks in bedrock. Quartz, being lighter, tends to remain suspended in water longer and is carried farther downstream, often leaving the concentrated gold-rich layers largely free of quartz.

2. Mechanical Sorting

Placer formation is a natural process of mechanical sorting. As rivers and glaciers move sediments, they sort particles by size, shape, and density. Heavy minerals such as gold, magnetite, garnet, and ilmenite tend to accumulate in the same zones, while lighter minerals like quartz, feldspar, and mica are dispersed.

3. Weathering and Chemical Breakdown

In some cases, the quartz that originally hosted gold in bedrock veins may break down into smaller grains or sand, which are more easily carried away by water. Meanwhile, gold resists chemical weathering, so it remains concentrated in placer deposits while quartz is largely transported out of the system.

In short, the absence of quartz in placer gold deposits reflects the interplay of density, transport dynamics, and natural sorting processes, which leave the heavy, resistant gold behind while lighter quartz is carried away.

For prospectors, the presence of black sand (magnetite and ilmenite) is often a good sign when panning for gold.

Eskers: Natural Concentrators of Gold and Heavy Minerals

 

Eskers can stretch for dozens of miles, although they were often formed in shorter segments. Studies show that the sediment within any section of an esker usually comes from a relatively small part of the glacier’s drainage system—often within about five miles of where it was deposited. Because the water flowing through these tunnels moved quickly, eskers frequently concentrated heavy minerals such as gold, magnetite, garnet, and ilmenite, which is why streams that cut through esker gravels can sometimes be good places to pan for gold.

What are some Gold Bearing Eskers in Ontario?

While Ontario is not famous for large placer gold deposits, a number of eskers that pass through or down-ice from gold-bearing bedrock belts have long attracted the attention of prospectors. These ridges of well-washed sand and gravel are relatively easy to sample, and in some areas they contain small amounts of placer gold derived from nearby lode deposits.

One of the best known systems is the Abitibi esker network, which runs through the gold-rich Abitibi greenstone belt in northeastern Ontario. Eskers in the Timmins–Matheson–Kirkland Lake region were formed by melt water flowing across terrain that hosts some of Canada’s most productive gold mines. Because glaciers eroded quartz veins and sulfide mineralization from these belts, traces of gold were carried into the glacial sediments. Prospectors occasionally recover fine placer gold in streams cutting through these eskers, especially where the gravel is re-concentrated by modern water flow.

 

Another important system is the Munro Esker, a large and well-studied esker near Kirkland Lake and Matheson. This esker extends for many kilometers and is considered one of the more prominent glacial ridges in the region. Because it crosses terrain containing gold deposits of the Kirkland Lake camp, its sediments include material eroded from mineralized volcanic and intrusive rocks. Prospectors have sampled the gravels and nearby creeks for fine gold, although concentrations are usually small and scattered.

In northwestern Ontario, the Agassiz eskers associated with the former glacial Lake Agassiz basin are also of interest to placer prospectors. These eskers run through areas such as Red Lake and the surrounding greenstone belts, which host some of the richest gold deposits in Canada. Melt water streams that formed the eskers carried eroded material from these gold-bearing rocks, and some gravels contain traces of placer gold. Where modern rivers cut into the eskers, the material can be naturally reworked and slightly enriched, making these spots attractive for small-scale prospecting.

 

Another region with notable eskers is along the north shore of Lake Superior near Wawa and Michipicoten. This area lies within the Michipicoten greenstone belt, which contains historic gold mines and numerous mineral occurrences. Eskers in this district were formed by melt water draining southward toward the Lake Superior basin and contain sediments derived from the surrounding gold-bearing bedrock. While the gold found in these gravels is typically fine and not present in large quantities, the eskers remain interesting exploration targets because they concentrate well-sorted sediments that can preserve traces of placer gold eroded from nearby lode sources.

Ontario is best known for its hard-rock mining, gold, copper, silver and nickel.

Many a hobby prospector has worked the bancroft area finding only small traces of flour gold. The york river has been said to yield some small trace colors for some, it would seem that just down stream of Egan chutes would be a good spot. And yes, there is a flake of gold in the pan.

Left: A moraine at the front edge of a glacier, where the till has all been pushed up by the snout of the glacier and it now lies as a mound of unsorted, glacially worn rocks and other sediments of varying size. 

Above: an out wash plain where varying size cobbles and other sediments lie afront the glacier having been washed by melt water and spread out in a roughly sorted way.

Left: an esker forms from rivers flowing beneath or suspended within glaciers.

Right: As the glacier melts the river bed is dropped upon the landscape. Its seldom this obvious as the ridge is usually partly eroded and covered in vegetation.

Below: The icon of our company, "Dark star Crystal Mines.

Flowing water concentrates the gold. Weight and velocity are the key factors that determine where a flake or nugget will settle.

Left: Debris entrained witjhin the ice is transported varying distances from its source. Heavier materials tend to drop close to their source. Lighter materials (diamonds) are carried some distance away.

Below: A glacial erratic, worn and carried by the ice.

Right: as the ice front retreats, eskers are laid out in front and it is in those eskers that heavy minerals are sorted.

Left: Sand and gravel pits are typically developed in glacial deposits where the material can be excavated with loaders and processed through screening and washing plants. Major producing regions include areas surrounding the Greater Toronto Area, the Niagara Escarpment corridor, and glacial deposits across central Ontario such as those near Simcoe County and Waterloo Region. In addition to gravel pits, large limestone and dolostone quarries along the Niagara Escarpment provide crushed stone used for road base and concrete aggregate.

The above screen shot sourced from Google Earth

Right: Deposits build up at both the edges and the front of the glacier. 

 

  • Location: Lateral moraines occur along the glacier’s sides, while terminal moraines form at its front.

  • Shape: Lateral moraines are long ridges running parallel to the glacier’s flow; terminal moraines form curved ridges that cross the valley.

  • Formation process: Lateral moraines collect debris from valley walls and glacier margins, whereas terminal moraines form from material pushed and dumped at the glacier’s leading edge.

As global climate gradually warmed, the edges of this ice sheet began to melt and retreat northward.

The retreat did not occur smoothly. Instead, the glacier advanced and retreated in stages, sometimes pausing long enough to build ridges of debris called moraines. Large amounts of meltwater flowed along the ice margin and beneath the glacier, forming eskers, outwash plains, and vast temporary lakes. One of the largest of these was glacial Lake Agassiz, which covered huge areas of central Canada and the northern United States and periodically drained enormous floods of freshwater toward the ocean.

Above: A landscape striated by drumlins (Peterborough, Ont), the steeper side of the drumlin indicates the direction from which the ice was moving. Both drumlins and the orientation of erratics and pebbles are indicative of past ice flows.

Right: There is a general decrease in the size of float fragments with increasing distance from their bedrock source. Close to the source outcrop, the debris may include large, angular blocks or boulders that have not yet traveled far. As the glacier carries the material farther away, those large blocks are gradually reduced into cobbles, then pebbles, and eventually sand and silt. This process is sometimes referred to by prospectors as the “size-reduction train” within a glacial dispersal train.

The fragments also become more rounded and worn as transport distance increases. Near the source they tend to be angular, with sharp edges. Farther down-ice they become sub-angular to rounded due to constant grinding between the glacier, the bedrock beneath it, and other rocks within the ice. In many glaciated regions, this progressive change in size, abundance, and roundness can help indicate the direction back toward the original source rock.

For prospectors, this pattern is extremely useful. By mapping the distribution and size of distinctive float—such as kimberlite fragments, gold-bearing quartz, or indicator minerals—one can often trace the dispersal train up-ice toward the bedrock source. The largest and least-rounded pieces usually occur closest to where the glacier first eroded the material, making them important clues when searching for hidden deposits beneath glacial cover in regions like Ontario.

Much as these are heavy minerals indicating the potential presence off gold, they are also soft and easily eroded so in no time at all they will simply be a fine black sediment in your pan. Left is sphalerite - a zinc ore.

Diamond indicator minerals are derived from northern kimberlites and consist of such minerals as G-10 garnets and chrome diopsides (right). The indicator minerals degrade quickly in the ice, but the diamonds for their durability travel far.

Left: Tapping an esker for placer gold. 

Above: almandine garnet- an indicator for gold, much as would be a spessertine garnet. Diamond is indicated by pyrope garnet (G10 and G9). The reason for the difference is that, 

  • Diamond garnets come from deep mantle rocks carried up by kimberlite.

  • Gold-area garnets come from metamorphic rocks in the crust where gold veins commonly form.

Its the Glaciers fault that our placers are so hard to find!

Map derived from google earth

Example of Esker Sedimentation: The Frankford–Marlbank Esker

The Frankford–Marlbank Esker in Hastings County is a notable glacial formation extending approximately 50 miles across the southern part of the county and into adjacent areas, lying about 4–12 miles north of Highway 401.

This esker crosses the Precambrian–Paleozoic bedrock contact, which makes its composition unique: northern segments are dominated by Precambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks, while southern sections increasingly contain Paleozoic fragments.

For example, at Egansville Station, gravel contains 18% Paleozoic rocks, rising to 50% at 3/8 mile and 74% at four miles south, reflecting the glacier’s ability to transport material from multiple sources.

 

Sedimentally, the esker was formed by subglacial meltwater streams, likely in tunnels beneath the ice sheet, and built in short, segmented sections.

Each segment collected sediment from a limited up-ice area, which explains the variation in rock types along its length.

As the ice margin retreated, the esker extended headward, adding new segments and creating a stratified, well-sorted gravel system with layers of heavy minerals such as magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, and occasional gold flakes.

For hobby prospectors, the Frankford–Marlbank Esker offers a unique opportunity. Its length, stratification, and mix of rock types create discrete pockets where heavy minerals and placer gold may accumulate.

 

Understanding the up-ice sources of each segment can help prospectors trace mineral float back to potential bedrock sources.

The esker’s position across a geological boundary also increases the diversity of minerals, making it a particularly interesting site for exploration. This demonstrates how eskers record the geology of the terrain they drained.

 

How to Prospect an Esker for Gold and Heavy Minerals

As pre-esker meltwater rivers moved through tunnels in the ice, they sorted sediments by size and weight. Dense materials such as gold, magnetite, garnet, and ilmenite settled more quickly than lighter sand and quartz.

Because of this natural sorting process, eskers can contain localized concentrations of heavy minerals.

The first step in prospecting is to examine the structure of the esker. Prospectors should walk along the crest and sides of the ridge looking for natural exposures such as gravel pits, road cuts, erosion gullies, or stream crossings where the internal layers of sediment are visible.

These exposures often reveal bands of coarse gravel and sand. Coarser gravel layers are usually the most promising because they formed during periods of stronger water flow capable of carrying larger and heavier particles.

Sampling should focus on areas where water flow would have slowed during deposition.

Flat stretches along the crest of the esker, bends in the ridge, and places where two esker segments join can act as natural traps for heavier material.

Inside bends and wider sections of the ridge often contain thicker accumulations of gravel where heavy minerals may have settled out of the meltwater streams.

The sides and base of the esker are also worth testing. Over time, rain and erosion can wash heavier minerals down the slopes of the ridge where they accumulate in small pockets of gravel.

Gullies or cuts into the esker often expose deeper sediment layers that are easier to sample than the compacted material near the top.

Digging down to the lowest gravel layer available may reveal concentrations of dense minerals hidden beneath the surface.

Once samples are collected, they can be processed by panning to concentrate the heavy minerals.

Lighter sand and gravel wash away, leaving behind black sands that may contain magnetite, garnet, ilmenite, and occasionally small flakes of gold.

By sampling at regular intervals along the esker and comparing the results, prospectors can identify sections of the ridge where heavy minerals are more abundant and potentially trace them back toward their geological source.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is Kimberlite?

 

If you are following up ice, the trail of diamond indicator minerals you might eventually end up standing above a kimberlite intrusion, keeping in mind it is a long shot considering how far diamonds entrained in glaciers are known to travel.

 

Kimberlite is a bluish igneous rock found almost exclusively in volcanic structures known as kimberlite pipes, and it plays a central role in the geology behind finding placer diamonds. Geologically, kimberlite is considered a rare variety of peridotite—an olivine-rich mantle rock that is also the source of the gemstone peridot. Because kimberlite is a rock composed of many minerals rather than a single mineral species, its chemistry varies, as does its appearance, but it is typically rich in magnesium and potassium and relatively low in silica. Unweathered kimberlite known as “blue ground,” a tougher rock that requires heavy machinery to extract the diamonds it may contain.

 

Unlike most igneous rocks that form in broad layers, kimberlite erupts violently from deep within the Earth’s mantle and solidifies in carrot-shaped volcanic conduits called kimberlite pipes. These ancient volcanic structures are important sources of diamonds and are also the ultimate bedrock source of many diamond indicator minerals found during exploration. Although more than 6,000 kimberlite pipes have been identified worldwide, only about 900 contain significant diamonds, and roughly 30 are rich enough to be mined commercially—making the erosion of these pipes an important process in the formation of diamond placers and the ongoing search for finding placer diamonds in glacial and river sediments.

Why Is It So Hard to Find Kimberlite Pipes?

Kimberlite pipes are notoriously difficult to locate for several geological and practical reasons. Even though they are the primary source of natural diamonds, most of their key features are subtle or hidden. Many kimberlites formed millions of years ago and have since been eroded or buried under sediment, soil, or glacial deposits. In regions like Canada, glaciers have left thick layers of till, sand, and clay that can completely obscure the pipes from surface view. Even pipes that once formed small hills may now lie invisible beneath meters of overburden.

Even when a kimberlite pipe reaches the surface, its expression is usually small and inconspicuous. A typical pipe may span hundreds of meters across but rise only a few meters above the surrounding terrain. The rocks themselves are often weathered and altered, sometimes resembling ordinary soil or clay, which makes them easy to overlook. Additionally, kimberlite pipes are irregular in shape, often carrot-like with branching roots, and may pinch out or split into multiple intrusive bodies, so their exact extent cannot be predicted without drilling.

Geologists rely on indicator minerals to trace kimberlites, but these clues are tiny and dispersed over wide areas. Magnetic, gravity, and seismic surveys can detect anomalies, but not all kimberlites are strongly magnetic, and geophysical signatures can be subtle or confused with other rock types. Glacial transport further complicates detection: ice sheets moved kimberlite fragments and indicator minerals tens to hundreds of kilometers from their source, leaving diamonds and garnets in river gravels and tills far from the original pipe. This means that a placer diamond may appear long before the kimberlite that produced it is discovered.

In Canada, glacial activity not only disperses diamonds into placers but also buries the kimberlites themselves under thick layers of sediment, sometimes tens of meters deep. The combination of rarity, burial, subtle surface expression, and dispersal by ice makes kimberlites a “needle in a haystack” for geologists and prospectors. Consequently, exploration depends on a careful combination of indicator mineral studies, geophysical surveys, and targeted drilling, with placer diamond finds often serving as the first clue that a kimberlite may exist kilometers away.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How does Kimberlite weather?

Canadian kimberlites, ranging in age from about 1123 to 45 million years, were often heavily weathered well before the Quaternary glaciations. Soon after emplacement, macrocrysts and primary groundmass minerals commonly began to alter, with many replaced by serpentine and calcite. Volcaniclastic kimberlites, especially those in crater and diatreme zones, are highly porous and thus particularly susceptible to post-emplacement weathering. Over time, this breakdown produces a soft, friable, clay-rich material commonly referred to as “yellow” or “blue” ground, which contrasts with the more competent, fresh kimberlite beneath.

Glacial activity during the Quaternary further modified these rocks, removing varying amounts of the weathered regolith and in some cases eroding into the underlying fresh kimberlite. In northeastern Ontario’s Lake Timiskaming kimberlite field, glaciers stripped the entire weathered layer from some pipes, leaving glacially striated kimberlite beneath thick till, while other pipes retained several metres of regolith. Because kimberlite is generally more erodible than surrounding bedrock, many kimberlite bodies now occur in depressions under swamps or small lakes or are buried beneath glacial sediments. In contrast, where kimberlite is relatively competent, such as in the Head Hills field, it can form topographic highs relative to softer surrounding rocks.

Kimberlite Indicator Minerals

Kimberlite bodies that may contain diamonds are commonly identified by the presence of distinctive indicator minerals in surrounding sediments. The most important of these include pyrope garnet, magnesian ilmenite (containing roughly 8–16 percent MgO), olivine, and chrome diopside. Among these minerals, pyrope garnet is particularly useful because of its characteristic violet-red to orange-red colour, which makes it easier to recognize in heavy-mineral concentrates. In laboratory work, pyrope can be separated from other garnets using heavy liquids. For example, in a liquid with a specific gravity of about 3.8, pyrope will float while the more common almandine garnet sinks.

 

Studies carried out in the former USSR examined how these indicator minerals behave in streams downstream from kimberlite pipes. The results showed that pyrope and magnesian ilmenite may persist for about a mile from the source with little reduction in quantity, although their grain size gradually decreases to fractions of a millimeter. Over very long distances, however, their abundance declines significantly; laboratory experiments suggested that after about 96 miles of transport only about 10 percent of the original material remains. Other indicator minerals tend to disappear more quickly. Olivine typically persists for three to three and a half miles downstream, while chrome diopside rarely survives more than a few hundred yards from the kimberlite source. Field studies also indicate that streams draining kimberlite intrusions may show anomalously high concentrations of certain metals, particularly zinc, due to post-magmatic mineralization occurring around the kimberlite contact zone.

The relative abundance of indicator minerals can vary widely between kimberlite fields and even between individual kimberlites within the same field, so it is important to recover all indicator mineral species rather than focusing on just one or two. For instance, Cr-pyrope and Cr-diopside dominate in the Lac de Gras kimberlite field in the central Slave region, whereas Mg-ilmenite is most abundant in the Kikerk Lake cluster in the north Slave region. Differences in mineral abundance can also help distinguish overlapping dispersal trains, as seen near Kirkland Lake, where the Diamond Lake kimberlite contains over 5,000 Mg-ilmenite grains per 10 kg sample, while the nearby C14 kimberlite, 20 km to the northwest, has fewer than 10 grains per 10 kg, a pattern mirrored in the down-ice glacial sediments.

Heavy Mineral Separation of Pyrope Garnet

In heavy mineral separation, pyrope may float in heavy liquids while almandine garnet sinks.

Indicator Mineral Transport Studies in the Soviet Union and elsewhere examined how kimberlite indicator minerals behave in streams.

Results showed that:


• Pyrope and magnesian ilmenite can persist for about one mile downstream with little reduction in quantity.
• Grain size gradually decreases during transport.
• Over very long distances—up to about 96 miles—only about 10 percent of the original material remains.
• Olivine usually persists only 3 to 3½ miles downstream.
• Chrome diopside generally disappears within a few hundred yards.

 

These patterns help geologists estimate how far indicator minerals may have travelled from their kimberlite source.

 

Diamonds Found in Glacial Drift Around the Great Lakes

Since the 19th century, more than 80 diamonds have been found in glacial deposits around the Great Lakes. Most were discovered while prospectors were panning river gravels for gold. Ontario’s find involved a 33-carat rough diamond discovered before 1920 while digging a railway cut between Ottawa and Toronto, apparently near Peterborough. The stone was later shown to mineralogist George F. Kunz. The exact source of these diamonds remains unknown. Some geologists have suggested they may originate from undiscovered kimberlite pipes buried beneath glacial sediments. It was foreshadowing of the future as it is now known that there are many kimberlite pipes in the north.

These discoveries include:
• 34 in Indiana
• 25 in Illinois
• 16 in Wisconsin
• 2 in Michigan
• 2 in Ohio
• 1 in Ontario

 

The kimberlites most likely to contribute placer diamonds to Ontario landscapes are those within the Attawapiskat kimberlite field in the James Bay Lowlands and the Kirkland Lake/Temiskaming fields. These sources are concentrated in northern Ontario, with glacial action transporting indicator minerals and diamonds in a generally southward/southwestward direction toward the Great Lakes. Based on the many placer diamonds found in the US, it stands to reason that placer diamonds don’t just stay neatly inside borders.

The reason Ontario has relatively few placer diamonds, even though several kimberlite pipes exist, comes down to a combination of glacial history, erosion time, and the nature of the kimberlite bodies themselves. These factors strongly influence the success of anyone interested in finding placer diamonds in Ontario, and they also explain why placer deposits are far more common in other parts of the world.

Many of the kimberlite pipes in northern Ontario, especially those in the James Bay Lowlands, formed during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, roughly 110–180 million years ago. In geological terms, that is relatively young. Because they are young, these pipes have not had tens of millions of years of river erosion to break them down and release large quantities of diamonds into surrounding river systems.

Many Ontario kimberlite pipes are relatively small volcanic intrusions compared with some of the giant pipes in Africa or Siberia. Smaller pipes typically contain fewer total diamonds, which further reduces the chances of forming large placer concentrations. Even the pipe that hosted the Victor Diamond Mine near Attawapiskat required large-scale industrial mining to extract diamonds economically.

By contrast, major placer diamond regions such as those in South Africa or Russia often contain kimberlites that are much older and have been eroding for far longer. Over those long periods, rivers repeatedly reworked the diamonds, concentrating them into rich placer deposits.

When I visited Andy Christie (Princess sodalite Mine) and Ralph Schroetter in cobalt both spoke of a prospecting trip that they were planning. Their intention was to prospect for diamonds in the local stream beds. The plan was to use UV light in hopes of seeing a fluorescence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canadian Diamonds Found in U.S. States

Lake Superior Region (Minnesota & Michigan)

Source: Northwest Territories kimberlites (Canadian Shield)

Glacial ice sheets during the last ice age transported material from the Canadian Shield southward. Prospectors in Minnesota and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan have occasionally recovered tiny, gem-quality diamonds from glacial deposits and ancient river terraces. Most finds are small, and the diamonds are often “floats” — loose grains or pebbles transported far from their original kimberlite pipes.

St. Lawrence Valley and Northern New York

Source: Canadian Shield kimberlites in Ontario and Quebec

Glacial meltwater and ice movement carried kimberlitic material southward into New York State. Prospectors have occasionally found indicator minerals like garnet and chromite alongside rare diamond fragments in alluvial sediments. These finds are mostly of academic or collector interest rather than economic.

Glacial Outwash in New England

Source: Northern Ontario and Quebec kimberlites

Glacial transport during the Wisconsinan glaciation spread diamondiferous till into parts of New England. A few historic reports, particularly in Vermont and New Hampshire, document small, water-worn diamonds in river gravels believed to have originated in Canada, although these are extremely rare.

Key Characteristics of Canadian-Derived Diamonds Found in the U.S.

• Size: Usually very small (sub-carat, often millimeter-scale)
• Shape: Well-rounded due to transport in rivers and glacial grinding
• Mineral Associations: Often accompanied by kimberlitic indicator minerals such as pyrope garnet, chromite, and ilmenite
• Rarity: Extremely rare; no known commercial deposits in the U.S. sourced from Canadian kimberlites exist.

 

Diamond Discoveries in Ontario

Diamonds are rare in Ontario, but a few confirmed discoveries and several important exploration areas are known. Most finds have been in glacial drift or kimberlite pipes rather than in large diamond-bearing placers like those in Africa or Russia.

While there are some alluvial concentrations, the majority of Canadian diamonds come from primary kimberlite pipes mined commercially.

Below are the main places where diamonds or diamond-bearing rocks have been found in Ontario.

Near Peterborough (Historic Alluvial Find)

 

One of the earliest reported diamonds in Canada was found near Peterborough sometime before 1920.

• A 33-carat rough diamond was discovered while digging a railway cut between Ottawa and Toronto.
• The stone was rough and broken and had little gem value.

 

This diamond was found in glacial sediments, and the original source of the stone is still unknown.

Attawapiskat / James Bay Lowlands

The most important diamond discovery in Ontario occurred in the James Bay Lowlands near the community of Attawapiskat.

• This area contains the Attawapiskat kimberlite field, a cluster of volcanic pipes that brought diamonds to the surface.
• It hosted the Victor Diamond Mine, which opened in 2008 and produced diamonds from two kimberlite pipes.

This was Ontario’s first and only operating diamond mine to date.

Temiskaming – Cobalt – Kirkland Lake Area

Northeastern Ontario has become one of the most active diamond exploration regions.

Important discoveries include:
• Lapointe Kimberlite near Temiskaming
• Kimberlite pipes in Lundy Township and near Cobalt
• Micro-diamonds recovered from kimberlite samples in the area

Exploration has confirmed that several kimberlite bodies exist along the Ottawa–Timiskaming Rift zone, a deep structural fault system favorable for diamond-bearing intrusions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Madoc Area (Southeastern Ontario)

Micro-diamonds have been recovered from altered volcanic rocks north of Madoc.

Although the occurrences are small, they demonstrate that kimberlite related rocks capable of carrying diamonds occur in southeastern Ontario.

Other Diamond Exploration Regions in Ontario

Geological surveys have identified several additional areas with kimberlite or diamond indicator minerals, including:

• Wawa – Kapuskasing region
• Temagami – North Bay area
• Marathon area
• River Valley region
• Chapleau region

 

These areas contain kimberlite intrusions or indicator minerals such as pyrope garnet and chrome diopside, suggesting the potential for diamond sources.

Diamonds and Indicator Minerals in the Wawa Region

Diamonds and diamond indicator minerals have been reported in the area around Wawa, although no economic diamond mine has been developed there. The discoveries are mainly related to kimberlite-like intrusions and indicator minerals found during exploration programs.

Kimberlite Indicator Minerals in Wawa

Exploration work in the Wawa region—particularly around the Michipicoten greenstone belt near Lake Superior—has recovered several minerals that are commonly associated with diamond-bearing kimberlite. These include:

• Pyrope garnet
• Chrome diopside
• Magnesian ilmenite
• Olivine

 

These minerals were found in glacial sediments, stream gravels, and heavy-mineral concentrates, suggesting that kimberlite or related ultramafic intrusions may occur somewhere in the region.

Micro-diamonds in the Wawa Area

A few micro-diamonds (very small diamonds usually less than a millimeter in size) have reportedly been recovered from drill samples or exploration concentrates in parts of the Wawa area. Micro-diamonds are important in exploration because they demonstrate that the magma source had the potential to carry diamonds from deep within the mantle.

However, the quantities discovered so far have been very small, and no kimberlite body in the region has yet proven large or rich enough to support commercial mining.

Why the Wawa Area Is Geologically Interesting

The Wawa region sits within the ancient rocks of the Canadian Shield, which contain deep crustal structures capable of hosting kimberlite intrusions. Glacial activity also moved large amounts of sediment across the area, meaning that diamond indicator minerals found in streams or eskers may have been transported some distance from their original source.

Because of this, exploration geologists have periodically investigated the region for potential kimberlite pipes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Placer Diamond Discoveries Near Wawa

Diamond discoveries in the Wawa area of Ontario began with alluvial finds in river gravels, particularly along the Dead River, a tributary of the Michipicoten River. In 1991, prospectors recovered several small diamonds from these gravels, two of which were confirmed as industrial-grade stones weighing just over 1 carat each. These early discoveries demonstrated that upstream sources contained diamondiferous rocks, sparking interest in the region among both hobbyists and professional explorers.

Subsequent sampling and prospecting along creeks and river channels near Wawa continued to yield placer diamonds. The most notable alluvial discoveries occurred at the Leadbetter property, where a 1.39-carat gem-quality diamond and smaller fragments were recovered from creek sediments. Hundreds of micro-diamonds were also found in the gravel, showing that ancient fluvial processes had concentrated and transported diamonds from their primary bedrock sources downstream into accessible river gravels.

These placer diamonds are generally small, water-worn, and associated with sands and gravels, reflecting the long transport from upstream volcanic or lamprophyric sources. While the Wawa area does host bedrock diamond occurrences, the placer finds remain the most tangible evidence of diamond potential in the region, highlighting the importance of rivers and glacially influenced drainage in concentrating diamonds for discovery.

While the region has not produced commercial diamonds like the deposits near Attawapiskat—home to the former Victor Diamond Mine—it remains a geologically promising area that has attracted periodic diamond exploration.

In short, the Wawa district has produced indicator minerals and occasional micro-diamonds, showing that diamond-bearing magma reached the area at some point in geological history, even though an economic deposit has not yet been found.

FAQ: Finding Placer Gold in Ontario and Finding Placer Diamonds in Ontario

1. Where can hobby prospectors find the best placer gold eskers in Ontario?

For hobby prospectors interested in finding placer gold in Ontario, glacial eskers are some of the most promising geological features to explore. Ontario’s most productive placer gold eskers include the Frankford–Marlbank Esker in Hastings County, the Munro Esker near Gauthier Township, the Vermilion River Eskers around Kirkland Lake, and the Wanapitei River eskers in Marshay Township.

These long glacial ridges formed from melt water streams flowing beneath the last Ice Age glaciers and often contain layers of sand, gravel, and heavy minerals. When prospectors pan or sample these deposits, they frequently recover fine placer gold flakes along with magnetite, garnet, ilmenite, and other dense minerals. Because these heavy minerals settle together in glacial gravels, eskers are excellent locations for hobbyists interested in finding placer gold in Ontario using simple gold panning and small-scale prospecting techniques.

2. How do I identify diamond indicator minerals in Ontario glacial deposits?

Anyone interested in finding placer diamonds in Ontario must first learn to recognize diamond indicator minerals, which are minerals that commonly occur alongside diamonds in kimberlite pipes. Important indicator minerals include pyrope garnet, magnesian ilmenite, chrome diopside, and olivine.

These minerals are often recovered from glacial till, eskers, river gravels, and out wash deposits across Ontario. When prospectors pan heavy mineral concentrates from these sediments, the presence of indicator minerals can suggest that glacial ice transported material from a diamond-bearing kimberlite source somewhere up-ice. Although actual diamonds are extremely rare in glacial sediments, identifying these indicators is a crucial step in finding placer diamonds in Ontario and tracing them back toward potential kimberlite pipes within the Canadian Shield.

3. What impact did the Laurentide Ice Sheet have on gold and diamond distribution in Ontario?

The massive Laurentide Ice Sheet played a dominant role in shaping the modern distribution of both gold and diamond indicator minerals across the province. During the last Ice Age, glaciers scoured the Canadian Shield, eroding bedrock and transporting enormous quantities of sediment southward across Ontario.

As the glaciers melted, they deposited this material in eskers, moraines, out-wash plains, and buried river valleys, concentrating heavy minerals such as gold, garnet, magnetite, and ilmenite. Understanding historic glacial ice-flow directions and melt water channels is therefore essential for anyone interested in finding placer gold in Ontario or finding placer diamonds in Ontario, because these patterns help prospectors trace sediments back toward their original bedrock sources.

4. Are there buried pre-glacial channels that concentrate gold and diamonds in Ontario?

Yes. Beneath many parts of Ontario’s glacial sediments lie ancient pre-glacial river channels that formed long before the Ice Age. These buried valleys often act as natural traps for heavy minerals and can contain concentrated layers of placer material. One well-known example is the Mattagami River valley near Timmins, where deep sediment deposits contain glacially transported heavy minerals.

These hidden channels can hold placer gold, garnet, magnetite, and kimberlite indicator minerals, making them important exploration targets for both professional geologists and hobby prospectors. By studying drill records, seismic surveys, and sediment sampling, researchers can locate these ancient valleys and evaluate their potential for finding placer gold in Ontario and possibly even finding placer diamonds in Ontario.

5. What are the best techniques for finding placer gold and diamonds in Ontario?

The most effective methods for finding placer gold in Ontario and finding placer diamonds in Ontario rely on careful sampling of sediments where heavy minerals naturally accumulate. Prospectors should focus on eskers, glacial till, out wash plains, gravel bars, and river deposits, especially where layers rich in dense minerals occur.

Successful prospecting often involves gold panning, heavy-mineral concentration, and systematic sampling of glacial sediments. Pay special attention to deposits containing magnetite, ilmenite, garnet, pyrope, and other dense minerals, as these frequently occur alongside gold and diamond indicator minerals. By combining careful sampling with knowledge of Ontario’s glacial geology, ice-flow history, and Canadian Shield bedrock, prospectors significantly improve their chances of finding placer gold in Ontario or locating the rare micro-diamonds that indicate potential diamond sources in the province.

 

Conclusion: Understanding the Landscape When Finding Placer Gold in Ontario and Finding Placer Diamonds in Ontario

 

In the end, finding placer gold in Ontario or finding placer diamonds in Ontario requires far more than luck. Successful rockhounding and prospecting depend on understanding how Ontario’s landscape was shaped by glaciers and how those glaciers redistributed minerals across the province. Anyone interested in finding placer deposits must combine knowledge of glacial landforms with a solid understanding of the bedrock geology of the Canadian Shield, which is the ultimate source of most gold and diamond indicator minerals found in Ontario sediments.

During the last Ice Age, the enormous Laurentide Ice Sheet scraped across Ontario, eroding ancient bedrock and transporting vast quantities of sand, gravel, and heavy minerals. As the ice gradually melted, powerful melt water rivers sorted these sediments into distinctive glacial features such as eskers, out-wash plains, gravel terraces, and buried valleys. These natural sorting processes concentrated dense materials like gold, magnetite, garnet, and diamond indicator minerals within layers of sand and gravel. For modern hobby prospectors interested in finding placer gold in Ontario or finding placer diamonds in Ontario, learning to recognize these glacial features in the landscape is one of the most important prospecting skills.

By studying the direction of ancient ice flow and the patterns of glacial deposition, prospectors can greatly improve their chances of success. Heavy minerals tend to accumulate in predictable locations where water slowed and dropped its sediment load. This is why careful sampling of eskers, stream gravels, and glacial out-wash deposits can reveal fine gold flakes or heavy-mineral concentrates that point toward a nearby source. Understanding these patterns is fundamental to finding placer gold in Ontario, and it also plays an important role in finding placer diamonds in Ontario, where the goal is often to locate diamond indicator minerals that trace back toward kimberlite sources.

However, it is important to remember that gold and diamonds behave very differently during glacial transport. Gold is extremely dense and tends to settle quickly, meaning that most placer gold deposits in Ontario occur relatively close to their original bedrock sources within the Canadian Shield. Diamonds, by contrast, are lighter relative to gold and can be carried long distances by moving ice and glacial melt water. As a result, diamonds originating in northern Canadian kimberlite fields have sometimes been transported hundreds of kilometers southward, even appearing in glacial moraines and sediments in parts of the northern United States. This difference explains why finding placer gold in Ontario often leads prospectors toward nearby source rocks, while finding placer diamonds in Ontario may require tracing indicator minerals across much larger glacial transport paths.

Although Ontario may never rival the world’s great placer regions such as those in Alaska or the Yukon, the province’s glacial landscape still offers intriguing opportunities for patient explorers. For those willing to study glacial geology, read the land carefully, and sample sediments methodically, the process of finding placer gold in Ontario and even the rare success of finding placer diamonds in Ontario remains one of the most fascinating and rewarding pursuits in Canadian rockhounding.

 

 

Michael Gordon – Gemologist, Rockhound, and Author

Michael Gordon is a gemologist and cut diamond grader, co-owner of Dark Star Crystal Mines, and author of the three-part Rockhound series which is purchasable on this site. With a degree in Geography from the University of Guelph, he specializes in Bancroft area vein dykes, skarns and pegmatites. Michael is also the founder of Caver461, a YouTube channel dedicated to crystal hunting, mineral exploration, and educational geology, helping hobbyists and collectors discover the natural treasures of Canada’s geologically rich landscapes.

Works Cited,​

  • Ontario Geological Survey. Quaternary Geology of Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4

  • Walter S. Fyfe, Alexander J. M. Gleadow, and others. Ontario Geological Survey: Geology and Mineral Deposits of Ontario

  • Peter A. Cawood et al. The Abitibi Greenstone Belt: Archean Metallogeny and Tectonic Evolution

  • Geological Survey of Canada. Glacial Transport and Dispersal of Indicator Minerals in Canada.

  • Charles Fipke and Stewart Blusson. Research papers on kimberlite indicator minerals and diamond exploration in glaciated terrains

  • Nikolai N. Sobolev. Indicator Minerals in Diamond Exploration. Published by Elsevier, 1977.

  • M. B. McClenaghan, and B. A. Kjarsgaard. Year. Indicator Mineral and Surficial Geochemical Exploration Methods for Kimberlite in Glaciated Terrain: Examples from Canada. Ottawa: Geological Survey of Canada

Last Revised 2026

 

 Most fluorescent diamonds glow blue (95%), although some can appear yellow, green, orange, or white. About 65% of diamonds do not fluoresce at all. Fluorescence occurs because of trace impurities in the diamond crystal structure, particularly nitrogen defects.

One of the reasons this method works is that many surrounding minerals—such as quartz or feldspar—either do not fluoresce or glow much more weakly. This contrast can allow diamonds to stand out when illuminated with a strong UV lamp.

In glaciated regions like parts of Ontario, diamonds transported by ice can occasionally appear in eskers, outwash gravels, or glacial tills. Nighttime UV scanning of gravel piles or esker deposits can sometimes reveal fluorescent stones.

 

Although it can be effective, UV prospecting has several limitations:

  • Not all diamonds fluoresce (roughly 25–35% show noticeable fluorescence).

  • Some other minerals also glow under UV, which can cause false positives.

  • Dirt, coatings, or water can reduce fluorescence.

  • Daylight overwhelms the glow, so the search must be done in darkness.

Right: James examines Volcanic breccia just outside Cobalt, Ontario. As of the early 2000s, 21 kimberlite pipes had been discovered around Temiskaming. The most promising pipe to date is the 95-2 pipe which is situated 20 kilometers north west of Cobalt. Though tiny, the diamonds are perfect black octahedrons.

Historic placer find;

​​

  • Found sometime between 1903–1905 in the silver mining area near Cobalt, its original size was around 800 carats before cutting. It was eventually cut by Tiffany & Co.

  • The kimberlite source has never been discovered, suggesting the stone may have been transported by glaciers from elsewhere.

The Kon showing is located about 10–11 km south of Cobalt.

  • One of the few confirmed kimberlite occurrences in the immediate area of the town.

Kimberlite bodies do occur in the Wawa area, but they’re not as well‑established or economically developed as classic kimberlite pipe districts like the Victor Mine in northern Ontario. Scientific studies and Ontario Geological Survey records describe kimberlites of Mesoproterozoic age (~1,097 Ma) in the Wawa region. These are true kimberlitic rocks with mantle minerals and xenoliths typical of kimberlite magmas.

  • These kimberlites have been petrographically described as Group‑1 kimberlites, carrying mantle indicator minerals such as pyrope garnet (both Fe‑Ti and Cr varieties), chrome spinel, olivine, and ilmenite — many of which are classic kimberlite indicator minerals used in diamond exploration.

Many diamond finds in the Wawa area are not in classic kimberlite pipes. Instead, some diamonds occur in Archean lamprophyric volcaniclastic rocks and breccias that formed ~2.9–2.7 Ga, part of the Michipicoten greenstone belt. These rocks are considered unconventional hosts compared to typical Phanerozoic kimberlites elsewhere

Check out the Rockhound series. It covers rockhounding in Ontario and includes both geological discussion and historical context to the current rockhounding situation in the province. bring your book on a Dark star Crystal Mines dig and I'll sign it for you.

Purchase one  of the Rockhound series here (or all of them)

Left: Your search location in the esker is important so examine a topo map for places where the esker thickens, the curves and bends and where it might have entered a lake and the water slowed. Knowledge and planning is key to your success in finding placer minerals.

Below: small diamond in kimberlite rock. Note the traces of peridot, garnet and chrome diopside.

Left: Here kimberlite pipes are exposed in inverse. you can imagine the carrot shape (wider at the top) and the root of the pipe that extends down deeply into the mantle.

bottom of page